Showing posts with label HOUSING. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HOUSING. Show all posts

Monday, November 29, 2010

THE HOUSING PROBLEM IN 3 PICTURES

Home ? Chart Of The Day, Headline, Most Recent Stories, Strategy Lab

29 November 2010 by TPC 2 Comments

My outlook for housing remains largely unchanged in recent months.? Earlier this year I said the housing market was likely to come under renewed pressures in the second half of 2010 as government intervention ended and the market was allowed to begin clearing:

“As I said above, the most likely scenario is the “work-out”.?? Government stimulus continues to bolster the private sector in the back half of 2010, but the lack of direct aid in housing begins to weigh on the housing market in the second half of 2010.? Negative seasonal trends make for a very difficult H2 in housing and a tough start in 2011.? The economy appears fairly strong into the latter portion of 2010, but the dwindling stimulus ultimately pressures the private sector.? Demand for housing remains tepid as job growth is weak, the unemployment rate remains above 8% into 2011 and the negative inventory trends prove too much for the real estate market to overcome.? Ultimately, prices decline 7%-15% over the course of the coming 2.5 years.”

We’ve seen clear evidence in recent weeks that the housing double dip is in process.? Price declines have varied depending on different reports with the prices of new homes reported as low as -13% year over year.? The problems in housing remain entirely intact and as I’ve repeatedly stated over the course of the housing crisis it remains a problem of supply and demand.

If you’re attempting to visualize the problems in the housing market look no further than the following three charts (via Mortgage News Daily):

Demand

Supply

Price

With supply near its all-time highs and demand near its all-time lows it’s safe to assume that prices have only one direction to move and that’s lower.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————

The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The opinions of all guest authors or contributors can and will differ from those of Mr. Roche. These opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions or investment decisions of Mr. Roche. The author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and may or may not seek to do business with one another or companies mentioned via this website. Any action that you take as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

A brief note on comments – The increase in users in recent months has resulted in an increase in unproductive comments. Any user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users will be banned from the site. The comment section is welcome to all readers who are interested in asking pertinent questions and/or engaging in thoughtful, intelligent, and productive debate. In short, just be nice. Thanks.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

HOUSING MARKET: STILL TOO MUCH SUPPLY

Housing woes are starting to come back into the forefront as several reports in recent weeks have shown a sharp decline in US real estate prices.? Unfortunately, the problems are severe and likely to persist.? As I’ve regularly argued in recent years the current housing issue remains an econ 101 story – supply and demand.? The current supply is simply too enormous for the market to overcome.? In today’s chart of the day Bloomberg highlighted just how enormous this supply overhang is:

“So many U.S. homes are unoccupied these days that demand may not catch up with the supply until 2014, according to Josh Levin, an analyst at Citigroup Inc.

The CHART OF THE DAY displays the percentage of housing units that are vacant, according to quarterly data compiled by the Commerce Department. The chart also shows housing starts as a percentage of homes already built, or the housing stock.”

“Last quarter’s vacancy rate was 10.96 percent, near a peak of 11.05 percent in the second quarter. These figures are based on the number of homes for sale and apartments for rent that are designed for year-round occupancy, and include mobile homes.

About 2.1 million homes now available aren’t needed, Levin wrote in a report yesterday. The estimate is based on the overall rate, along with separate figures for houses and apartments.

“It will take three to four years to work off the excess supply and reach equilibrium,” he wrote. This means housing starts are unlikely to follow “a V-shaped recovery pattern” after plunging in the past few years, the report said.”

Source: Bloomberg

——————————————————————————————————————————————————

The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The opinions of all guest authors or contributors can and will differ from those of Mr. Roche. These opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions or investment decisions of Mr. Roche. The author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and may or may not seek to do business with one another or companies mentioned via this website. Any action that you take as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

A brief note on comments – The increase in users in recent months has resulted in an increase in unproductive comments. Any user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users will be banned from the site. The comment section is welcome to all readers who are interested in asking pertinent questions and/or engaging in thoughtful, intelligent, and productive debate. In short, just be nice. Thanks.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

LOWE’S CEO: HOUSING DOUBLE DIPPING, TO FALL “AT LEAST” THROUGH MID 2011

The housing double dip may very well be the most important story heading into 2011. ?Although local by nature the impact of a continued downturn in housing should not be downplayed. ?Housing was the domino that set the entire credit crisis in motion in 2007. ?In addition, declining asset prices are the most destructive facet of a balance sheet recession. ?Richard Koo has recently described how this phenomena was what ultimately dragged Japan into deflation:

“Real estate, the stock market, and everything else.? When that bubble collapsed, asset prices fell, but the liabilities remained.? Balance sheets all over Japan in the private sector were underwater.? Although they were bankrupt, the cash flow of many of these companies was still very good.? Japan continued to run one of the largest trade surpluses in the world.? So companies had the cash flow, but balance sheets were underwater.

If you put anyone in that situation, what would they do?? They will use the cash flow to pay down debt, because shareholders don’t want to be told that their shares were just a piece of paper.? Bankers don’t want to be told that their loans are all nonperforming.? Workers don’t want to be told that there are no more jobs tomorrow.? For all the stakeholders involved, the right thing to do was to use the cash flow to repair their balance sheets.

The problem is, when everybody does that all at the same time, what happens to the national economy?? If someone is saving money or paying down debt, you better have someone on the other side borrowing and spending money.? In the usual world, we have the financial sector in the middle taking the money from this side and giving it to people on that side.? If there are too many people who want to borrow money, interest rates rise; if there are too few, you bring interest rates down, and the money circulates in the economy.

But what we discovered when our bubble burst was that even with zero interest rates, no one was borrowing money.? Everybody was paying down debt, because their balance sheets were all underwater.? No one wanted to borrow money.”

In the USA it is primarily the household balance sheet that remains underwater (although much of the banking sector also remains deeply troubled).? This is important because Mr. Bernanke is attempting to combat this with a very blunt policy tool – monetary policy. ?Hence, why the Central Bank is attempting to keep asset prices “higher than they otherwise would be.” ?Unfortunately, QE is unlikely to be effective in fighting the housing decline. ?Further housing declines will have wide reaching negative impacts on an already fragile economy.

To highlight the importance of housing it’s worth reviewing the housing market wealth effect. ?Contrary to opinions you might have heard recently concerning the Fed and the equity market wealth effect,?Robert Shiller has come to different conclusions regarding the impact of rising and falling equity and house prices. ?Although he found no evidence of a wealth effect in equities he did find that house values significantly impact economic activity:

“the evidence of a stock market wealth effect is weak; the common presumption that there is strong evidence for the wealth effect is not supported in our results.? However, we do find strong evidence that variations in housing market wealth have important effects upon consumption. “

Lowe’s reported earnings yesterday and they provided some insights on the current state of housing.? On the conference call Robert Niblock, CEO of Lowe’s confirmed that housing is indeed double dipping and that prices are likely to continue falling “at least” through the middle of 2011.? Niblock says prices will only fall 4-8% further.? Zillow and Clear Capital are both reporting declines of -4.3% and -6.8% in the latest quarter.? S&P predicts prices will decline 7-10% in 2011.

Earlier this year I said home prices were likely to remain strong through H1 due to government intervention before succumbing to the supply/demand imbalance as the government stepped aside. ?My estimates are a bit more negative with total declines of ~15% before housing finds a sustainable bottom in 2011 or 2012. ?It’s very important that investors keep close tabs on the housing market and the developing double dip. ?If it materializes into a substantial decline it will have a very negative impact on economic growth in 2011 and could potentially trigger fears of a 2008 repeat.

The pertinent portion of the Lowes conference call is attached:

Michael Lasser – Barclays Capital

Good morning. Thanks a lot for taking my question. So as you think about the relationship between housing turnover and your comps, what do you think the correlation is going to be moving forward? Is that going to become decoupled? Are we reaching—and why might that be? Is it because we’re reaching a base level of demand? How are you contemplating that.

Robert Niblock

I’ll start, Michael, then I’ll ask Greg Bridgeford to join in. I think—in the past, housing turnover has been as important in the past. I would think it’s still important today and it’ll be important in the future because, as you know, it provides a natural incident for the homeowners who need to come and buy products related to the home in our industry. Obviously what’s been challenging is even though that there’s been still continued positive correlation associated with that, the bigger issue is the more than offsetting fact that the pullback you’ve seen in overall demand with unemployment where it’s at and with home prices continuing to drop. You know, home prices were down about 29% when they bottomed in January or so earlier this year. When you had the stimulus programs for the home buying tax credit, you saw a little bit of a pick back up; but now home prices are falling again and probably anticipated to fall through at least the middle of next year, so you’ve probably got another four to eight percent or so, potentially, on home price decline. And even though we’re gaining jobs, that’s still not growing fast enough to drop the unemployment rate on the jobs front So even though you’re seeing fundamental improvement, the majority of the decline of home prices is behind us, we are gaining jobs – all those type of things are positive signs. Those two halo effects – employment and the continued decline in home prices – probably offset or kind of water down what you would normally see as that correlation you’ve been able to draw on in the past between housing turnover and our sales. So housing turnover is still important, but it’s offset by some of these other factors. (emphasis added).

Source: Seeking Alpha

——————————————————————————————————————————————————

The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The opinions of all guest authors or contributors can and will differ from those of Mr. Roche. These opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions or investment decisions of Mr. Roche. The author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and may or may not seek to do business with one another or companies mentioned via this website. Any action that you take as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

A brief note on comments – The increase in users in recent months has resulted in an increase in unproductive comments. Any user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users will be banned from the site. The comment section is welcome to all readers who are interested in asking pertinent questions and/or engaging in thoughtful, intelligent, and productive debate. In short, just be nice. Thanks.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Saturday, October 30, 2010

DIP DOUBLE HOUSING ARRIVES IN THE UK

Home ' Most recent successes

28 October 2010 by PTC 0 Comments

Identify the US housing market according to national house price UK House prices monthly index of:?

?October saw a continuation of the modest downward trend in the price of real estate that started at the beginning of the ".
summer.The average price of a typical UK property declined by a seasonally 0.7% month in October.Three months on three-month rate of change - a smoother price - recent trends indicator fell to subsector %-1.0% in September October .c ' is the largest decline over three months since April 2009, but it is still well below the rate of 5 to 6% reduction on the measurement of three months during the second half of 2008.Le annual rate of change, which compares the current level of prices of real estate against twelve months - ago level decreased of + 3.1% in September to octobre.Si % the recent trend in real estate prices continue in November and December, annual rate of house price inflation would fall to between 0% and 1% at the end of 2010. This compared with a rate of per cent at the end of 2009.

Source:. national

——————————————————————————————————————————————————

The content of this site is provided as general information only and should not be considered advice investment .all the content of the site should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or participate in any particular trading strategy or investment.The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the companies affiliated to the author (s).The opinions of all the guest authors or contributors and will differ from those of m. Roche.These opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions or Mr. Roche investment decisions.The authors are, or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and can or cannot seek to do business with one another or companies referred to by this site Web.Toute action you take information and analysis on this site is your responsabilité.Consultez ultimately your investment advisor before taking an investment decision.

A short note on the comments-the increase in users of recent months has led to increased improductifs.Tout user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users is prohibited on the comments section site.La feedback is welcome to all readers interested in relevant questions and engage in a thoughtful, intelligent discussion and brief productive.En, just be agréable.Merci.

Post footer automatically generated by The Plugin add footer post for wordpress.

This entry transmitted via the service for full-text RSS - if this is your content and you read on someone to another site, please read our FAQ page fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Article five filters features: After Hiroshima - non-rapport Cancer Catastrophe of Fallujah.


View the original article here