Showing posts with label SEASON. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SEASON. Show all posts

Friday, December 24, 2010

SALES SEASON ROUNDUP

By Annaly Capital Management

Seasonally adjusted greetings to Annaly Salvos readers around the world!

In the commercial spirit of the season (and a day early for our blog post this week), we thought we’d go down a level from the headline retail sales numbers, which have been trending strongly of late. In November, retail sales rose 0.8%, and October and September were both revised upwards. Many economists are pointing to the relative strength of this three-month set to predict a decent 4th quarter GDP number. Macroeconomic Advisors has raised its estimate to over 3%. “The report on retail sales through November,” they write, “was much stronger than expected, and even with offsets to our assumptions for imports and inventories, we revised up our current-quarter tracking forecast of GDP growth by four tenths on this report.”

The results for selected line items were consistent with the theme that Americans are starting to spend a little bit more on things that fall more into the “discretionary spending” category, while cutting back on most purchases related to buying new houses. So to begin at the top, total retail sales (less food and autos) were approximately $338 billion at a seasonally adjusted rate in November, up 8.1% from a year ago and within shouting distance of the cyclical peak of $342 billion in November 2007. (All retail sales data are through November 2010.)

Sales at furniture and home furnishing stores, which rose along with the strong housing market, are still languishing below the cyclical peak and bumping along the cyclical trough.

Likewise, sales at electronic and appliance stores, which we would put in the same general “new home sales” category as furniture, are also skittering along the cyclical bottom.

In contrast, building materials, garden equipment and supply dealers, more reflective of the do-it-yourself category of housing-related consumption, are registering double-digit year-over-year sales growth. After the collapse in this category’s sales over the last two years, and with prospects for the housing market still weak, perhaps people have capitulated on maintenance and upgrades.

Recreational purchases are rising faster than the cohort. Sporting goods, hobby, book and music stores are rising impressively on a year-over-year basis, perhaps reflecting the trend towards staycations and the tentative beginnings of the resumption of discretionary spending.

Likewise for the “miscellaneous” category of retail sales, which encompasses stationery, gift, novelty, souvenir and used merchandise stores. They are rising at a double-digit year-over-year pace.


The lump of coal in the sales stockings is new home sales, which are still at generational lows after the mid-decade top. The population of the United States has about doubled since the 1960s, and yet new home sales are less than the run rate of that era. Moreover, it is the first time that new home sales have continued to decline after the official end of a recession. The question before the market is whether or not we can have a sustainable recovery without the important contribution of the housing sector.


——————————————————————————————————————————————————

The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The opinions of all guest authors or contributors can and will differ from those of Mr. Roche. These opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions or investment decisions of Mr. Roche. The author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and may or may not seek to do business with one another or companies mentioned via this website. Any action that you take as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

A brief note on comments – The increase in users in recent months has resulted in an increase in unproductive comments. Any user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users will be banned from the site. The comment section is welcome to all readers who are interested in asking pertinent questions and/or engaging in thoughtful, intelligent, and productive debate. In short, just be nice. Thanks.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Late-night Ratings: Leno & Fallon Hit Highs In Viewers, 'Nightline' Takes Season Lead

Nellie Andreeva

NBC won three nights in primetime last week, and its ratings gains also carried over to late-night. Both Jay Leno (4.2 million viewers) and Jimmy Fallon (1.9 million) hit season highs in total viewers. for the week of Dec. 13-17. Leno also topped Letterman and Nightline/Jimmy Kimmel in every key category and also prevailed over Conan O'Brien's TBS show (1.1 rating vs. 0.7) in adults 18-49 for a fourth straight week. Fallon too topped Ferguson and Kimmel in every major category.

Leno widened his margin of victory over Letterman in 18-49 to 22% in viewers (1.402 million vs. 1.149 million), up from a 3% win for the same week last year when Conan was the host of The Tonight Show. Similarly, Fallon topped Late Late Show for the week by 25% (861,000 vs. 689,000), up from last year's 3%.

Versus the first 13 weeks of last season, Tonight is matching its year-ago 1.0 rating in adults 18-49 and is 6% below its year-ago 18-49 viewership, while CBS' Late Show is down 10% in rating (0.9 vs. 1.0) and down 14% in 18-49 viewers. In total viewers, Tonight is up 52% versus last season, Late Show is down 15%.
ABC’s Nightline was second for the week among total viewers (3.87 million) and adults 18-49 (1.24 million). Season-to-date, Nightline ranks in first place among viewers and A25-54, the first time the newsmagazine has been in first place at this point in the season since at least the 1993-94 season when the Late Show with David Letterman began on CBS.

TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Broadcast Nets Are Going For Genre And Period Dramas This Development Season, But Can Such Series Work On The Big 4?

Nellie Andreeva

Genre series are all the rage in cable with the success of AMC's The Walking Dead and HBO's True Blood, which have been breaking series records to rank as their network's top-rated series and become pop culture staples. A genre series, The Vampire Diaries, also is the highest-rated series on the CW, which has had continuous success in the sci-fi arena with veterans Smallville and Supernatural. But, with the exception of ABC's Lost, sci-fi, vampire, zombie and comic book-based series have struggled to attract sizable audiences on the major broadcast networks. That has not deterred the nets to heavily pursue such projects this development season. The 2 drama pilots ordered so far by Fox are both in the genre category: Locke & Key is based on Joe Hill's comic, and Alcatraz features missing Alcatraz prisoners who reappear in present day. Genre projects have also attracted some of the biggest writer-producers in town: Lost's J.J. Abrams is behind Fox's series Fringe and Alcatraz, David E. Kelley, who dabbled into sci-fi with Life on Mars, is developing a series adaptation of comic book icon Wonder Woman, Greg Berlanti co-created and is executive producing ABC's freshman superhero family drama No Ordinary Family, Fringe co-creators Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci are executive producing Locke & Key, and Battlestar Galactica's David Eick is involved in a series adaptation of The Hulk for ABC and Marvel.

ABC, the network that had the most recent genre drama success with Lost and has 2 such series on the air, No Ordinary Family and V, is making big bets in the field. What's more, it is looking to translate the genre movies' big success at the box-office to the small screen by bringing in the auspices behind some of the biggest genre feature hits. Melissa Rosenberg, the writer of the hugely popular Twilight movie franchise, is writing AKA Jessica Jones, a drama about a former female superhero based on a Marvel comic. Oren Peli, the writer-director of the blockbuster Paranormal Activity franchise, is behind a paranormal drama set in the Amazon, and Pan's Labyrinth and the Hellboy mastermind Guillermo Del Toro is partnering with Eick on the adaptation of The Hulk.

But can genre movies' box-office success be replicated on mainstream TV? For the most part, the answer seems to be no. The closest to a genre hit on the big broadcast networks these days is CBS' hit comedy The Big Bang Theory, which has geek overtones but is broad enough to attract wide audiences. But CBS' vampire drama Moonlight and horror drama Harper's Island and ABC's sci-fi series Flash Forward lasted a season each. The 4 genre dramas on the major broadcast networks right now, Fringe, No Ordinary Family, Human Target and The Event, attract the same average audiences of 5-6 million viewers as cable series The Walking Dead and True Blood. (Fringe's viewership is even lower, 4.5-5 million and will probably go further down when the show relocates to Fridays, but the series is a major DVR gainer, which brings it up on par with the others.) Maybe this is the ceiling for genre series no matter what type a network they are on. For a cable net, that is a great number but for a major broadcaster, it is way too small. Of course, there are those lightning-in-a-bottle cases like Lost and the first season of Heroes that transcend the core sci-fi fan base and enter mainstream, but long-running hit genre drama series on the Big Four like The X-Files seem to be a thing of the past. It doesn't help that most of those series are serialized, a genre that has been struggling mightily on broadcast TV.

Along with genre projects, the often serialized period and costume dramas are also in fashion at the broadcast networks this development season. ABC is developing an Pan Am-themed drama set in the 1960s with Jack Orman and Tommy Schlamme and a Romeo & Juliet adaptation set in Renaissance Italy written by Andrea Berloff; CBS is working on a reboot of The Wild Wild West from former CSI co-showrunner Naren Shankar and Battlestar Galactica developer Ron Moore; while NBC is shepherding a drama set at a 1960s Playboy club penned by Chad Hodge. Just like genre series, period and costume dramas have become staple on cable with AMC's?Mad Men and the upcoming Hell on Wheels, HBO's?Boardwalk Empire, Showtime's The Tudors and the upcoming?The Borgias, and Starz's Spartacus. But all recent attempts to launch such series on the broadcast networks have fizzled: ABC's Empire and Life on Mars and CBS' Swingtown barely lasted a season. And the CW's 1980s Gossip Girl spinoff didn't go beyond pilot stage. So when it comes to historic projects, history is not on the broadcast networks' side. But just like with genre dramas, the Big 4 are looking to write new history by taking a page from cable networks' book.

TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Thursday, December 9, 2010

WRAPPING UP A STRONG SEASON

By Dirk Van Dijk

Key Points:

  • 3Q Earnings season effectively done — 496 or 99.2% of S&P 500 reports in so far.
  • Strong earnings season, with a median EPS surprise of 4.92%, and a 3.74 surprise ratio. While those numbers are down from earlier in the reporting season, they are still very good. Total of 355 positive surprises and just 95 disappointments. Positive year-over-year growth for 377, falling EPS for 115 firms, 3.28 ratio. 71.6% of all reporting firms do better than expected, 76.0% report positive year-over-year growth. Total net income reported up 25.3%.
  • Sales Surprise ratio at 1.52, median surprise 0.79%, 56.9% of all firms do better than expected on top line. Revenue growth healthy at 8.13%.
  • Net margins fell slightly to 9.01% from 9.02 in the second quarter but far above 7.78% year ago level. Excluding Financials, net margins rise to 8.06% from 7.91% in the second quarter and 7.00% a year ago.
  • Total net income reported is $207.8 billion, up from $165.8 billion a year ago, $203.5 billion in second quarter.
  • Full year total earnings for the S&P 500 expected to jump 42.9% in 2010, 13.9% further in 2011. Total revenues for the S&P 500 expected to rise 5.22% in 2010, 5.69% in 2011.
  • Autos, Finance, Basic Materials and Energy expected to be earnings growth leaders in 2010.? Construction expected to move from the red to the black. No sector expected to see earnings declines in 2010 or in 2011.
  • Net Margins marching higher, from 5.88% in 2008 to 6.39% in 2009 to 8.68% expected for 2010, 9.35% expected for 2011. Major source of earnings growth. Net margins ex-financials 7.79% in 2008, 7.10% in 2009, 8.22% expected for 2010, 8.63% in 2011.
  • Revisions ratio for full S&P 500 at 1.78 for 2010, at 1.47 for 2011, both bullish readings. Ratio of firms with rising to falling mean estimates at 1.55 for 2010, 1.33 for 2011, also positive readings. Total revisions activity past peak, and plunging. Changes in revisions ratios driven by estimates falling out more than by new estimates added.
  • S&P 500 earned $544.3 billion in 2009, expected to earn $777.8 billion in 2010, $886.0 billion in 2011.
  • S&P 500 earned $57.62 in 2009: $81.98 in 2010 and $93.96 in 2011 expected, bottom up. Puts P/Es at 21.2x for 2009, 14.9x for 2010 and 13.0x for 2011.
  • Top Down estimates: $80.15 for 2010, $90.54 for 2011.

A Great Season

This has been a great reporting season, especially on the bottom line. The top line also looks good especially if one excludes the financials. However, soaring net margins have been the primary driver of the earnings growth.

Analysts have responded to the better-than-expected results by raising their estimates, but much more so for 2010 than for 2011. The (relative) lack of upward revisions for 2011 might be a yellow flag. It is not that the revisions ratio for 2011 is awful, it is in bullish territory at 1.47, but that it lags well behind that of 2010 at 1.78.

We are well past the peak estimate revisions activity, which is now plunging. As a result, changes in the revisions ratios are being driven more by old estimates falling out of the four-week running total than new estimates being added. Some of the differential between 2010 and 2011 is “mechanical.” Since the third quarter is part of fiscal year 2010, if a company beats by say $0.05, an analyst has to raise his fiscal year 2010 estimate or he is implicitly cutting his forecast for the fourth quarter.

An increase for fiscal 2011 means that the analyst sees the better-than-expected results for the third quarter as being sustainable at least in the medium term. Still, the 1.47 ratio is somewhat disappointing when almost four times as many firms beat the consensus in the third quarter as disappointed.

The stellar earnings growth is mostly due to the continued expansion of net margins. Much of the year-over-year margin expansion is due to the Financials, where the whole concept of revenues is a bit different from most companies, and thus the concept of net margins is also a bit different.

However, even if the Financials are excluded, net margins continue to march northward. Earnings growth so far has been stellar at 25.3% year over year, although that is down from the over 30% levels we were seeing earlier in the reporting season. It is also a slowdown from the 37.1% year over year growth that the same firms reported in the second quarter.

The remaining four companies left to report, are unlikely to significantly change the aggregate numbers. No sector has more than one firm left to report, and we have dispensed with the “yet to report” tables this week.

Full-Year Projections Favorable

The expectations for the full year are very healthy, with total net income for 2010 expected to rise to $777.8 billion in 2010, up from $544.3 billion in 2009. In 2011, the total net income for the S&P 500 should be $886.0 billion, or increases of 42.9% and 13.9%, respectively. Translated to “EPS” for the index, that would be $57.62 for 2009, $81.98 for 2010, and 93.96 for 2011.

In an environment where the 10-year T-note is yielding just 2.99%, a P/E of 14.9x based on 2010 and 13.0x based on 2011 earnings looks attractive. Much of the $600 billion in newly created money from QE2 is likely to eventually find its way into the equity market (not directly, but eventually). Historically, the year after mid-term elections has almost always been a good one for the stock market.

Potential Pitfalls

On the other hand, there is a very real prospect of total political gridlock, which would greatly raise uncertainty about governmental policy and the strength of the economy that could undermine confidence. In the short term, the prospect of about 2 million people losing their extended unemployment benefits will act as a significant drag on the economy, as dollar for dollar, extended benefits are amongst the most effective form of economic stimulus.

The additional monetary stimulus from QE2 will help boost the economy a little bit, but that could very easily be offset by a concretionary fiscal policy. The economy needs more fiscal stimulus, not less. Unfortunately, most of the electorate is not very well schooled in macroeconomics and clearly disagreed in the last election cycle.

The theoretical danger of QE2 is that it could lead to much higher inflation, but with the massive amount of slack in the economy right now, that risk seems pretty remote. QE2 should take the risk of deflation off the table.

The economy does seemed to have made a slow turn towards recovery. However, job creation remains very sluggish. Most of the real growth in the economy has come from higher productivity, not more hours being worked. Those productivity gains are accruing to capital, not labor, and are a major reason behind the strong earnings growth. In the third quarter, the firms in the S&P 500 earned a total of $207.8 billion, up from $165.8 billion in the third quarter of 2009.

S&P 500 Earnings to Hit New High in 2011

Still, companies are expected to continue growing their earnings nicely, and the 13.9% expected growth for 2011, if achieved, means that the total earnings for the S&P 500 should hit a new record by the middle of next year. The fact that analysts are, on balance, still raising estimates for 2011 increases the odds that that growth will be achieved.

Growth of 13.9% is not exactly awful. Even on the revenue side the expected growth of 5.69%, or 7.03% if one excludes the Financial sector is still pretty solid. That should be significantly higher than U.S. nominal GDP growth in 2001. Then again, firms in the S&P 500 tend to get a significant portion of their revenues (and earnings) from overseas, and the world economy is likely to grow significantly faster than the U.S. economy in 2011. Clearly the analytical community is not expecting the economy to turn south again.

Scorecard & Earnings Surprise

  • 496 firms have reported 3Q earnings. The remaining firms are unlikely to significantly change the overall results.
  • Strong season with a median surprise of 4.92%, and a 3.74 surprise ratio (355 beats, 95 misses), 71.6% of all firms beat expectations.
  • Positive year-over-year growth for 377, falling EPS for 115 firms, 3.28 ratio; 76.0% of all firms reporting have higher EPS than last year.
  • Total net income up 25.3%. All sectors but Construction have more positive surprises than disappointments. Eight sectors have surprise ratios of 7:1 or better. Disappointments concentrated in Finance, Utility and Energy sectors.

Historically, a “normal earnings season” will have a surprise ratio of about 3:1 and a median surprise of about 3.0%. Thus, this is a positive earnings season. While the season has faded a bit from when the first firms were reporting, it still looks to be a very solid season overall.

Scorecard & Earnings Surprise 3Q Reported
Income SurprisesYr/Yr
Growth
%
Reported
Surprise
Median
EPS
Surp
Pos
EPS
Surp
Neg
#
Grow
Pos
#
Grow
Neg
Conglomerates6.20%100.00%8.849163
Consumer Discretionary17.63%96.97%7.90226284
Industrial Products51.76%95.00%7.59152154
Auto90.75%100.00%7.245151
Computer and Tech45.83%100.00%5.96545609
Finance28.30%100.00%5.8651214830
Oils and Energy37.50%100.00%4.622313308
Business Service15.62%94.74%4.38161153
Medical10.79%100.00%4.123933512
Retail/Wholesale10.32%100.00%4.04365387
Transportation65.17%100.00%4.008190
Aerospace144.50%100.00%2.838182
Basic Materials42.34%100.00%2.70158194
Consumer Staples5.31%97.37%2.632582412
Utilities6.37%100.00%2.4724143112
Construction1148.57%100.00%0.005564
S&P25.33%99.20%4.9235595377115

Sales Surprises

  • Sales Surprise ratio at 1.52, median surprise 0.79%; 56.9% of all firms do better than expected on top line.
  • Growing Revenues outnumber falling revenues by ratio of 3.84; 79.0% of firms have higher revenues than a year ago.
  • Tech, Finance and Business service see widespread positive revenue surprises.
  • Revenue growth healthy at 8.13% but still greatly lags earnings growth pointing to net margin expansion (see net margin tables below).
Sales Surprises
Sales SurprisesYr/Yr
Growth
%
Reported
Surprise
Median
Sales
Surp
Pos
Sales
Surp
Neg
#
Grow
Pos
#
Grow
Neg
Auto5.02%100.00%2.6634251
Basic Materials17.45%100.00%2.654167230
Finance1.82%100.00%2.52939125028
Business Service7.68%94.74%1.563144171
Computer and Tech20.33%100.00%1.5445218637
Construction3.06%100.00%1.1886565
Industrial Products23.36%95.00%0.977127163
Oils and Energy16.11%100.00%0.8282315335
Consumer Discretionary3.60%96.97%0.6222012257
Retail/Wholesale3.71%100.00%0.3392718405
Medical8.50%100.00%0.0724233214
Transportation16.71%100.00%-0.0514590
Consumer Staples3.68%97.37%-0.56714232511
Utilities5.59%100.00%-0.8352023349
Conglomerates-0.11%100.00%-1.6484564
Aerospace2.36%100.00%-2.313782
S&P8.13%99.20%0.785282186392102

Reported Quarterly Growth: Total Net Income

The first table shows the actual reported growth of those that have already reported (496), and excludes the four which have not yet reported.

  • The total net income is 25.3% above what was reported in the third quarter of 2009, down from 37.1% growth in the second quarter. Sequential earnings growth is 1.10%.
  • Thirteen sectors reporting showing double digit earnings growth, seven with more than 40% growth. Cyclical sectors lead the growth parade.
  • Only four sectors showing acceleration in year-over-year growth from second quarter, twelve decelerate.
Quarterly Growth: Total Net Income Reported
Income GrowthSequential Q4/Q3 ESequential Q3/Q2 AYear over Year
3Q 10 A
Year over Year
4Q 10 E
Year over Year
2Q 10 A
Construction-27.84%-37.21%1148.57%8.73%1060.00%
Aerospace2.02%-2.81%144.50%-9.24%-1.73%
Auto-10.26%-18.76%90.75%11.09%808.63%
Transportation-4.27%5.16%65.17%28.48%73.88%
Industrial Products-11.25%3.28%51.76%50.85%65.22%
Computer and Tech5.46%9.11%45.83%12.25%59.65%
Basic Materials10.35%-12.87%42.34%42.94%114.14%
Oils and Energy1.35%-9.58%37.50%24.90%95.23%
Finance-7.13%-4.87%28.30%164.99%40.60%
Consumer Discretionary-10.69%18.96%17.63%3.96%25.37%
Business Service10.29%3.13%15.62%14.22%20.01%
Medical-8.98%-0.96%10.79%1.70%16.90%
Retail/Wholesale35.17%-4.63%10.32%12.73%9.71%
Utilities-30.02%21.54%6.37%-0.02%6.87%
Conglomerates-5.33%5.34%6.20%-0.22%-0.58%
Consumer Staples-10.36%7.73%5.31%-0.02%7.14%
S&P-2.66%1.10%25.33%21.78%37.09%

Quarterly Growth: Total Revenues Reported

This table excludes the 4 firms that have not reported.

  • Five sectors reporting revenue growth of over 16%. Industrials and Tech in the lead, Materials, Transports and Energy also very strong.
  • Seven sectors showing growth of less than 4%.
  • S&P 500 reported Revenues up 8.1% year over year in 3Q, down from 10.7% revenue increase the same firms showed in the 2Q. This is still a very healthy level of revenue growth.
  • Slowdown to 3.37% year-over-year growth expected for fourth quarter.
Quarterly Growth: Total Revenues Reported
Sales GrowthSequential Q4/Q3 ESequential Q3/Q2 AYear over Year
3Q 10 A
Year over Year
4Q 10 E
Year over Year
2Q 09 A
Industrial Products-1.54%3.50%23.36%19.08%19.32%
Computer and Tech0.29%4.26%20.33%11.83%22.17%
Basic Materials-6.76%-0.64%17.45%11.39%18.54%
Transportation1.09%1.22%16.71%12.43%20.20%
Oils and Energy4.86%1.31%16.11%16.83%27.70%
Medical2.72%-0.58%8.50%2.50%10.09%
Business Service1.66%1.89%7.68%5.55%7.56%
Utilities-5.26%10.73%5.59%7.40%1.98%
Auto-1.79%-6.73%5.02%-6.91%26.09%
Retail/Wholesale3.42%0.03%3.71%6.05%4.20%
Consumer Staples-10.22%-1.49%3.68%-2.39%7.30%
Consumer Discretionary-4.14%4.22%3.60%4.71%7.97%
Construction-7.98%-1.86%3.06%-4.81%7.90%
Aerospace-2.52%2.47%2.36%1.25%-2.25%
Finance-21.63%-0.12%1.82%-18.96%3.74%
Conglomerates-2.73%-2.67%-0.11%1.31%2.10%
S&P1.76%1.14%8.13%3.37%10.71%

Quarterly Net Margins Reported

  • This is for the 496 firms that have already reported, calculated as total net income for the sector divided by total revenues for the sector. With the vast amount of firms already having reported, these are pretty close to the final figures.
  • Net margins for S&P 500 expand to 9.01% from 7.78% a year ago, and down slightly from the 9.02% reported by these same firms in the second quarter. Net margins, ex-Financials, rise to 8.06% from 7.00% a year ago.
  • All sectors reporting year-over-year increase in margins, seven see sequential improvement.
  • Some sectors will see bigger seasonal swings in margins than others.
  • Six sectors report double-digit net margins, Tech consistent margin king.
Quarterly: Net Margins Reported
Net MarginsQ4 2010 EstimatedQ3 2010 Reported2Q 2010 Reported1Q 2010 Reported4Q 2009 Reported3Q 2009 Reported
Computer and Tech16.69%16.74%15.99%15.40%16.62%13.81%
Business Service13.55%12.89%12.74%12.41%12.52%12.01%
Consumer Staples10.76%11.84%10.82%10.61%10.51%11.65%
Finance12.71%10.96%11.51%11.13%3.89%8.70%
Consumer Discretionary8.83%10.43%9.14%8.61%8.89%9.18%
Medical8.96%10.13%10.17%10.17%9.03%9.93%
Conglomerates8.17%9.35%8.64%7.36%8.29%8.79%
Utilities6.35%9.08%8.27%8.03%6.82%9.01%
Transportation7.92%8.49%8.17%6.09%6.93%6.00%
Industrial Products7.17%7.83%7.85%6.11%5.66%6.36%
Oils and Energy6.69%7.11%7.96%7.31%6.26%6.00%
Aerospace6.23%6.44%6.79%5.94%6.96%2.70%
Basic Materials6.89%6.27%7.15%7.39%5.37%5.18%
Auto4.93%5.45%6.26%5.12%4.13%3.00%
Retail/Wholesale4.47%3.73%3.92%3.83%4.20%3.51%
Construction1.79%2.34%3.66%1.78%1.57%0.19%
S&P 5008.66%9.01%9.02%8.57%7.32%7.78%
SP ex Fin’l7.82%8.06%7.91%7.46%7.27%7.00%

Annual Total Net Income Growth

  • Total S&P 500 Net Income in 2009 was 1.28% above 2008 levels, following 34.7% plunge in 2008.
  • Total earnings for the S&P 500 expected to jump 42.9% in 2010, 13.9% further in 2011.
  • Earnings recovery to happen by mid-2011, full year 2011 earnings to be 6.1% above 2007 levels. In other words, the recovery in earnings will occur far before the recovery in jobs as we are unlikely to return to 2007 job levels until mid-2015 at the earliest.
  • Autos, Finance, Basic Materials and Energy expected to be earnings growth leaders in 2010. Construction expected to move from the red to the black. No sector expected to see earnings decline in 2010 or in 2011.
  • Retail, Medical and Business Service the only sectors to post positive earnings growth in every year from 2008 through 2011.
  • All but three sectors expected to post double digit growth in 2011; cyclicals lead.
  • Twelve sectors expected to grow slower in 2011 than 2010, four expected to see growth accelerate.
Annual Total Net Income Growth
Net Income Growth2008200920102011
Construction+ to -- to -- to +305.14%
Basic Materials-4.89%-49.90%64.22%27.36%
Industrial Products6.93%-38.63%41.27%24.82%
Finance+ to -- to +323.04%20.94%
Transportation0.93%-30.15%43.58%19.75%
Consumer Discretionary6.25%-15.89%21.84%17.47%
Conglomerates-9.24%-23.83%1.54%17.24%
Business Service27.19%1.04%14.71%15.34%
Oils and Energy20.81%-56.29%48.53%13.58%
Auto+ to -- to +2142.96%13.36%
Retail/Wholesale1.36%2.61%13.99%12.82%
Computer and Tech14.99%-4.24%44.90%12.71%
Consumer Staples-7.86%5.60%10.99%9.56%
Medical9.30%2.17%8.29%6.80%
Aerospace13.35%-14.80%15.56%4.96%
Utilities-1.32%-13.52%1.37%4.54%
S&P-34.68%1.28%42.91%13.91%

Annual Total Revenue Growth

  • Total S&P 500 Revenue in 2009 6.74% below 2008 levels.
  • Total revenues for the S&P 500 expected to rise 5.22% in 2010, 5.69% in 2011.
  • Tech to lead 2010 revenue race, Energy and Industrials to take silver and bronze, but Transportation and Materials to also grow more than 13%.
  • All sectors expected to show positive top-line growth in 2011.
  • Financials the biggest drag on 2010 revenue growth, Staples and Aerospace only other sectors expected to post lower top line for the year. Revenues for Financials are notoriously flakey; low interest rates depress interest income (but also interest expense).
  • Revenue growth significantly different if Financials are excluded, down 10.46% in 2009, growth of 8.34% in 2010 and 7.03% in 2011.
  • Medical and Retail only sectors to have positive revenue growth for all three years.
  • Looking out to 2011, Energy and Industrials the only sectors expected to see double-digit revenue growth, although three other sectors expected to have revenue growth over 8%.
Annual Total Revenue Growth
Sales Growth200920102011
Oils and Energy-34.49%20.80%10.67%
Industrial Products-18.67%16.86%10.31%
Construction-15.92%0.27%8.66%
Auto-21.36%6.11%8.20%
Transportation-13.65%13.71%8.10%
Computer and Tech-6.22%22.36%7.17%
Basic Materials-19.30%14.49%6.77%
Business Service-2.35%7.42%6.28%
Consumer Discretionary-9.55%7.24%6.20%
Retail/Wholesale1.25%5.50%5.50%
Aerospace6.30%-0.10%5.06%
Consumer Staples-2.13%-2.82%4.78%
Medical6.06%9.35%3.62%
Utilities-5.87%3.92%2.46%
Conglomerates-13.27%0.67%2.23%
Finance21.16%-19.23%1.94%
S&P-6.74%5.22%5.69%
S&P ex Fin’l-10.46%8.34%7.03%


Annual Net Margins

  • Net Margins marching higher, from 5.88% in 2008 to 6.39% in 2009 to 8.68% expected for 2010, 9.35% expected for 2011. Major source of earnings growth.
  • Financials significantly distort overall net margins. Net margins ex-financials 7.79% in 2008, 7.10% in 2009, 8.22% expected for 2010, 8.63% in 2011.
  • Financials net margins soar from -8.42% in 2008 to 15.37% expected for 2011.
  • Fourteen sectors seeing higher net margins in 2010 than in 2009. All sectors but Aerospace expected to post higher net margins in 2011 than in 2010.
Annual Net Margins
Net Margins2008A2009A2010E2011E
Computer and Tech12.25%12.51%14.81%15.58%
Finance-8.42%2.47%12.95%15.37%
Business Service10.74%11.11%11.86%12.87%
Consumer Staples9.18%9.90%11.31%11.82%
Medical10.10%9.73%9.64%9.93%
Conglomerates9.29%8.16%8.23%9.44%
Consumer Discretionary8.00%7.44%8.46%9.35%
Transportation7.26%5.87%7.41%8.21%
Utilities8.74%8.03%7.83%7.99%
Industrial Products7.51%5.67%6.85%7.75%
Oils and Energy9.10%6.07%7.47%7.66%
Basic Materials7.20%4.47%6.41%7.65%
Aerospace6.77%5.43%6.28%6.27%
Auto-2.78%0.25%5.18%5.43%
Retail/Wholesale3.49%3.54%3.83%4.09%
Construction-2.33%-0.10%0.83%3.09%
S&P 5005.88%6.39%8.68%9.35%
S&P ex Financials7.79%7.10%8.22%8.63%

Revisions: Earnings
The Zacks Revisions Ratio: 2010

  • Revisions ratio for full S&P 500 at 2.08, up from 2.24 last week, a very bullish reading.
  • Transportation very strong, but seven other sectors have revisions ratios above 2.00.
  • Thirteen sectors with positive revisions ratios, only three below 1.0.
  • Construction and Conglomerates very weak.
  • Ratio of firms with rising to falling mean estimates at 1.89 down from 1.90 last week — still a bullish reading.
  • Total number of revisions (4 week total) up to 4,888 from 5,175 (-5.5%).
  • Increases up to 3,303 from 3,577 (-7.6%), cuts up to 1,585 from 1,598 (-0.1%).
  • Total Revisions activity passed peak. Over next six weeks plunge to less than a third of peak levels. Changes in revisions ratios will mostly be from old estimates falling out, not from new estimates being made.
The Zacks Revisions Ratio: 2010
Sector%Ch
Curr Fiscal Yr
Est – 4 wks
#
Firms
Up
#
Firms
Down
#
Ests
Up
#
Ests
Down
Revisions
Ratio
Firms
up/down
Transportation0.59812446.008.00
Industrial Products0.597935113.180.78
Retail/Wholesale-1.082914281942.992.07
Computer and Tech0.432923216772.811.26
Auto1.0960832.67999.99
Medical0.902615131502.621.73
Consumer Discretionary1.51189151582.602.00
Basic Materials0.0315732152.132.14
Finance-0.2444271561011.541.63
Consumer Staples-0.24211298661.481.75
Business Service0.029617121.421.50
Utilities-0.07221547421.121.47
Oils and Energy-0.1619161241191.041.19
Aerospace-0.16557120.581.00
Conglomerates-0.13359280.320.60
Construction-5.914713650.200.57
S&P-0.0126517113497571.781.55

Revisions: Earnings
The Zacks Revisions Ratio: 2011

  • Revisions ratio for full S&P 500 at 1.47, up from 1.41 last week, still in bullish territory.
  • Six sectors have at least two increases per cut; Industrials and Transports lead, other cyclicals also strong.
  • Four sectors with negative revisions ratios (below 1.0), eleven with ratios above 1.0.
  • Ratio of firms with rising estimate to falling mean estimates at 1.33 down from 1.49; still in bullish territory.
  • Construction looks very weak for 2011; almost five cuts per increase.
  • Total number of revisions (4 week total) at 2,215, down from 4,715 (-53.0%).
  • Increases down to 1,318 from 2,758 (-52.2%) cuts fall to 897 from 1,957 (-54.2%).
The Zacks Revisions Ratio: 2011
Sector%Ch
Next Fiscal Yr Est – 4 wks
#
Firms Up
#
Firms Down
#
Ests Up
#
Ests Down
Revisions
Ratio
Firms up/down
Industrial Products0.861513666.0015.00
Transportation0.68633074.292.00
Consumer Discretionary-0.91188138463.002.25
Basic Materials0.3213845162.811.63
Computer and Tech0.843619178772.311.89
Auto-0.2133632.001.00
Retail/Wholesale-0.3927142341201.951.93
Medical0.242122132881.500.95
Finance-0.9640301711191.441.33
Business Service-0.227617151.131.17
Conglomerates1.513519181.060.60
Oils and Energy-0.4619181401401.001.06
Consumer Staples-1.20171778850.921.00
Utilities-0.39192068790.860.95
Aerospace-0.292814200.700.25
Construction-7.064612580.210.67
S&P-0.3425018813188971.471.33

Total Income and Share

  • S&P 500 earned $544.3 billion in 2009, expected to earn $777.8 billion in 2010, $886.0 billion in 2011.
  • Finance share of total earnings moves from 5.9% in 2009 to 17.5% in 2010, 18.5% in 2011, regains total earnings crown.
  • Medical share of total earnings far exceeds market cap share (index weight), but earnings share expected to shrink from 17.3% in 2009 to 12.3% in 2011.
  • Market Cap shares of Construction, Retail, Transportation, Industrials and Business Service sectors far exceed both 2010 and 2011 earnings shares.
  • Finance and Autos have rising earnings shares and market cap shares well below 2011 earnings shares.
  • Staples, Utilities and Medical’s share of total net income falling rapidly.
Total Income and Share
Income ($ Bill)Total
Net
Income
$ 2009
Total
Net
Income
$ 2010
Total
Net
Income
$ 2011
% Total
S&P Earn
2009
% Total
S&P Earn
2010
% Total
S&P
Earn
2011
% Total
S&P Mkt
Cap
Finance$32,077$135,700$164,1155.89%17.45%18.52%15.69%
Computer and Tech$91,865$133,116$150,03316.88%17.11%16.93%18.19%
Medical$94,131$101,933$108,86617.30%13.11%12.29%10.24%
Oils and Energy$62,514$92,852$105,45711.49%11.94%11.90%11.28%
Consumer Staples$56,876$63,127$69,16310.45%8.12%7.81%8.56%
Retail/Wholesale$50,640$57,727$65,1289.30%7.42%7.35%8.63%
Utilities$49,644$50,323$52,6099.12%6.47%5.94%6.12%
Consumer Discretionary$23,040$28,072$32,9774.23%3.61%3.72%4.40%
Conglomerates$26,222$26,627$31,2174.82%3.42%3.52%3.74%
Basic Materials$13,463$22,109$28,1582.47%2.84%3.18%3.35%
Industrial Products$10,790$15,242$19,0251.98%1.96%2.15%2.45%
Aerospace$12,958$14,974$15,7172.38%1.93%1.77%1.64%
Business Service$11,494$13,185$15,2072.11%1.70%1.72%2.06%
Transportation$8,151$11,703$14,0141.50%1.50%1.58%1.99%
Auto$469$10,509$11,9130.09%1.35%1.34%1.17%
Construction($74)$598$2,423-0.01%0.08%0.27%0.49%
S&P$544,261$777,797$886,024100.00%100.00%100.00%100.00%

P/E Ratios

  • Trading at 14.9x 2010, 13.0x 2011 earnings, or earnings yields of 6.71% and 7.69%, respectively.
  • Earnings Yields extremely attractive relative to 10-year T-Note rate of 2.99%.
  • Medical has lowest P/E based on 2010 earnings. Medical, Finance, and Autos cheapest based on 2011 earnings.
  • Construction has highest P/E for 2010 and 2011.
  • Auto and Finance high 2009 P/Es to fall dramatically in 2010 and 2011.
  • S&P 500 earned $57.62 in 2009; $81.98 in 2010 and $93.96 in 2011 expected.
P/E Ratios
P/E2008200920102011
Medical12.812.611.610.9
Oils and EnergyNM56.513.411.0
AerospaceNM288.712.911.4
Finance12.414.612.612.0
Auto9.120.914.012.4
Utilities12.314.214.113.4
Basic Materials14.428.817.513.8
Consumer Staples12.616.516.213.9
Conglomerates21.922.915.814.0
Computer and Tech18.417.415.714.3
Retail/Wholesale16.126.218.614.9
Consumer Discretionary20.219.717.315.3
Industrial Products18.622.118.115.4
Busines Service20.920.718.015.6
Transportation19.828.319.716.4
ConstructionNMNM94.923.4
S&P 50021.521.214.913.0

Biggest FY1 Revisions

The table below shows the S&P 500 firms with the biggest increases in their FY1 (mostly 2010) mean estimate over the last 4 weeks. To qualify there must be more than 3 estimates for FY1, and have a mean estimate of more than $0.50. In addition to the change in the mean estimate, the net percentage of estimates being raised is shown for both FY1 and FY2, as well as the P/E ratios based on each year’s earnings is shown.

Note that estimate momentum and value are not mutually exclusive. The most interesting of these firms will be where the net revisions percentage (#up-#dn/Tot) is more than 0.50 but less than 1.00. Big mean estimate changes based on a handful of individual revisions are suspect, but could prove to be the most interesting if other analysts follow suit. On the other hand, if all the analysts have raised their estimates already, the mean estimate is less likely to rise again over the next month.

Biggest FY1 Revisions
CompanyTicker%Ch
Curr Fiscal Yr Est – 4 wks
%Ch
Next Fiscal Yr Est – 4 wks
# Up-Dn/Tot
%Ch
Curr Fiscal Yr Est – 4 wks
# Up-Dn/Tot
%Ch
Next Fiscal Yr Est – 4 wks
P/E using
Curr FY Est
P/E using
Next FY Est
Coventry HlthcrCVH27.94%6.02%1.000.717.179.20
Hartford Fin SvHIG21.17%0.39%0.940.008.376.14
Baker-HughesBHI11.85%8.78%0.910.8424.3315.46
Noble EnergyNBL11.69%6.99%0.790.4420.6418.89
Aetna Inc-NewAET11.18%1.32%0.750.338.449.36
Dell IncDELL9.46%4.38%0.770.619.709.11
Dow ChemicalDOW9.13%2.51%0.930.4016.9912.89
Humana Inc NewHUM9.08%1.29%0.730.148.639.53
Helmerich&PayneHP8.84%5.29%0.710.6214.1013.12
Rockwell AutomtROK8.40%7.88%1.000.4516.5614.18
Raytheon CoRTN8.26%-4.49%0.95-0.8210.169.56
Ford Motor CoF8.04%5.76%0.470.257.727.80
Polo Ralph LaurRL7.33%5.75%0.860.7920.6718.25
Ameriprise FinlAMP7.10%3.26%0.920.8311.719.96

We use the convention of referring to the next full fiscal year to be completed as 2010, not all firms are on December fiscal years, this can cause discontinuities in the data, particularly around this time of year.? The data is based on FY1, not based on 2010, even though I may call it 2010 in the report. All numbers, including historical ones, reflect the current composition of the S&P 500, thus some historical numbers may differ from those reported by S&P which are based on the composition of the index at the time of the reports.

Dirk van Dijk, CFA is the Chief Equity Strategist for Zacks.com. With more than 25 years investment experience he has become a popular commentator appearing in the Wall Street Journal and on CNBC. Dirk is also the Editor in charge of the market beating Zacks Strategic Investor service.

More about Zacks Strategic Investor >>

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured site: So, Why is Wikileaks a Good Thing Again?.


View the original article here

Monday, November 22, 2010

CMT Renews 'Singing Bee' For Season 3; Co-Creator Phil Gurin Signs With CAA

Nellie Andreeva

CMT has picked up one of its highest-rated series,?The Singing Bee, for a third season. The karaoke singing competition, from Juma Entertainment and the Gurin Co.,?is hosted by Melissa Peterman, who also toplines the network's first scripted sitcom,?Working Class, slated to premiere on Jan. 28. Singing Bee creator Gurin, who executive produces the series with?Bob Horowitz, has signed with CAA. He was most recently at Octagon with John Ferriter who previously repped him at WMA. Gurin?is also creator/executive producer of CMT’s Your Chance to Dance and has served as an executive producer on the Miss Universe and Miss USA shows on NBC for the past 8 years. His business manager is Alan Goldman.

TV Editor Nellie Andreeva - tip her here.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

OSCAR: Red Carpets Rolling Out For Contenders In Ultra-Crowded Season

Pete Hammond

The pace of the 2010 awards season seems at this early November juncture to be faster than any I can remember. (I feel like the title of the late and great?Jill Clayburgh’s star turn,?I’m Dancing As Fast As I Can.) Hopefuls are getting out there earlier, and more forcefully, in order to gain a foothold in the race any way they can.?Examples from just two days' worth of campaigning: Michelle Williams called me from the London set of My Week With Marilyn.?Yes, she’s playing the iconic Monroe but couldn’t yet articulate what that means to her and instead wanted to talk about her?awards contender, Blue Valentine. So we did?before I had to run off to the Four Seasons Hotel to chat with Robert Duvall about his contender, Get Low. It was?a summer release he's now trying to keep in the conversation by?doing an exhaustive series of interviews and Q&A sessions. For a guy who is about to turn 80, he could not have been more?energized even with the daunting prospect of facing months of the “season” still to go.?Javier Bardem called on his cell from a street corner in Madrid to recount for me the intense experience of making Biutiful. Then I had to again race to the Four Seasons?for back to back bar chats with two other Best Actor wannabes, Kevin Spacey who talked Casino Jack before Aaron Eckhart arrived 10 minutes later to discuss Rabbit Hole.

With the exception of?Get Low, all of the above were spotlighting work in independently made movies that are mid to late December releases. But their stars cannot afford to wait if they are to get?on the map in this ultra-crowded season.?The ever-busy Spacey?was at the Britannias and an MPTVF event ?on Thursday night and also turned up Sunday evening at the Pacific Design Center for an actor-centric?post-screening Q&A for SAG nominating committee members. Like an episode of Inside The Actors Studio, the packed house gave him a standing ovation. Reliable eyewitness sources tell me ?even more impressive standing O?happened to Halle Berry two nights in a row at the same place where she Q&A’d her December stealth entry, Frankie & Alice for?the NAACP Image Award voters Friday and SAG Nom Comm?Saturday. They marked her indie’s first screenings but Berry wasn’t watching. She was out in the lobby doing TV interviews about what the project meant to her as an actress. Meanwhile publicists were frantically cutting film clips for the late-breaking entrant and hoping to have their DVD screeners out well before Thanksgiving. As part of her?campaign,? Berry will also be “in conversation” with a career retrospective Tuesday night at the AFI Fest.

Speaking of that,?the AFI Film Festival?opened?with Twentieth Century Fox's Love And Other Drugs. The glut of?AFI galas?is because it's an inexpensive way for distribs to do LA premieres this time of year and still get maximum exposure. They included?The Weinstein Co’s Blue Valentine with co-star Ryan Gosling and director Derek Cianfrance on the carpet? at the Chinese. While down the street at the Egyptian, Sony Pictures Classics unveiled their comedy Barney’s Version with?superlative performances from stars Paul Giamatti, Minnie Driver, and Dustin and Jake Hoffman who were all?on hand for the stroll down that red carpet.?The film, based on the Mordecai Richler story and?previously seen in Venice and Toronto, was a hit at AFI with special praise for absent co-star Rosamund Pike who could find her way into the supporting actress race. Pike also co-stars in another of ?SPC’s Oscar hopefuls, Made In Dagenham, which has it’s LA premiere tonight? at AFI opposite Casino Jack with yet another appearance? from?Spacey.

There also was?the LA premiere of?The Weinstein Company’s?much-touted The King’s Speech --?which one recent Oscar-nominated producer described?to me?afterwards as “a wet dream for the ?Academy”. A pre-unspooling Q&A moderated by my pal Leonard Maltin featured director Tom Hooper, Colin Firth, and Geoffrey Rush who got sprung from Hawaiian locations of the new Pirates Of The Caribbean fourquel in order to make the quick trip to L.A..?Screenwriter David Seidler's decades-long efforts to tell this story made the film even possible and also was there but wasn’t a part of the Q&A.?Guess it just shows the status of the writer in Hollywood (or at least at the AFI fest). But I think it is?shameful that he wasn’t on the panel. Thankfully, Hooper got a chance to at least acknowledge him in separate remarks intro’ing the film.

I caught up with Seidler at the crowded Hollywood Roosevelt?party. At 73, he’s being portrayed as an overnight sensation. But the veteran writer is getting pissed about that falsehood. “The Hollywood Reporter said I was an unknown in their headline when, in fact, I’ve been around a long time and been nominated three times for WGA awards and won once,”?he told me. He pointed out that the paper could?have just looked?on IMDB where he has many top credits including Tucker: The Man And His?Dream which he wrote for Francis Ford Coppola.?When I asked him to clarify the Original Screenplay status of the film, he said that has also been misrepresented since some reports?have inaccurately said it started as a play. “I wrote it originally as a screenplay but then, as an exercise to improve it and solve some structure problems, my ex-wife suggested I re-write it as a play which I did. Once others became involved, though, it reverted to its original screenplay form.”?he emphasized it was never produced as a play, thus making it eligible for the Original Screenplay category where thankfully it doesn’t have to face off against Aaron Sorkin’s much-liked adaptation, The Social Network). Ironically, after the movie is released, it now?will become a play. Seidler says it was going to open?in March on Broadway but that was thought too close to the Oscars. So now?a West End opening in London?with acclaimed ex-Royal Shakespeare Company artistic director Adrian Noble?signed?to direct is planned.

I asked if King George VI's daughter, the current Queen of England,?had seen the movie and he said only her staff has viewed it so far – and liked it. But?Harvey Weinstein told me he’s working on getting her to see it. Harvey is understandably ebullient about the Oscar buzz for the movie but?is not?overplaying his hand too early in the game. As he told me, “I’ve done this a few times. Trust me. I know what I am doing.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.


View the original article here