Commodity traders have seen QE (the greatest monetary non-event) as a free ticket to speculate.? Due to sheer misinformation these traders are placing leveraged commodity bets with the idea that QE2 will soon flood the US economy with freshly printed dollars and cause rampant and destructive inflation.? Of course, that’s not even close to remotely true, but the speculative fervor has taken hold regardless.? Making matters worse is that this speculative ramp in commodities is occurring at a time when the economy remains fragile.? David Rosenberg elaborates:
“The first time oil went to $90/bbl in October 2007, the net speculative long position barely exceeded 130,000, and today it is over 200,000.? So if you think that this runup in crude prices reflects a booming global economy, with all deference to China’s backdrop, think again.? As in the case of most other commodities, the Fed has unleashed the floodgates of investor speculation on the commodity complex and while absolutely terrific windfall news for resource companies, this is going to represent the mother of all margin squeezes for businesses that actually have to deploy raw material in their production process.”
“Now, how can this possibly be constructive for the 90% of the U.S. earnings outlook that is not hooked to the basic commodity sector?? We don’t see where this is addressed anywhere in “Street” research, but maybe we’re just not looking hard enough.? But how will the surging energy costs fit in with expectations of record earnings and double-digit profit growth for 2011, or what this means for consumer discretionary spending as the surging price deflator depresses real incomes and expenditures.? Lest we remind you, when oil first tested the $90/bbl level back in October 2007, the U.S. economy slipped into recession, without anyone knowing it, including the Fed, including the long list of Wall Street economists, many of whom are still in their seats today.????? But here is the difference.? Back in October 2007:
- The trailing trend in U.S. real final sales was 2.5%, not 1.2%.
- The unemployment rate was 4.7%, not 9.6%.
- Core inflation (which removes the effects of food and energy) was running at 2.2%, not 0.8%.
- Manufacturing capacity utilization rates were 79%, not 72%.
- Consumer confidence was at 95 (the Conference Board’s measure), not 50.
In other words, the economy is much more vulnerable to an energy shock now than it was back then.? Indeed, did we hear right that John Chambers had the temerity to challenge consensus views and describe the macro background as being “a challenging environment”?”
Source: Gluskin Sheff
——————————————————————————————————————————————————
The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy. The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the opinions of firms affiliated with the author(s). The opinions of all guest authors or contributors can and will differ from those of Mr. Roche. These opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions or investment decisions of Mr. Roche. The author(s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and may or may not seek to do business with one another or companies mentioned via this website. Any action that you take as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.
A brief note on comments – The increase in users in recent months has resulted in an increase in unproductive comments. Any user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users will be banned from the site. The comment section is welcome to all readers who are interested in asking pertinent questions and/or engaging in thoughtful, intelligent, and productive debate. In short, just be nice. Thanks.
Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Falluja's Cancer Catastrophe.
View the original article here
EXCLUSIVE: CAA has just hired Kami Putnam-Heist away from WME, and I'm told the talent agent will bring her longtime client James Franco. Putnam-Heist has been with WME for more than five years. She has repped Franco for six years, signing him while she was an agent at Gersh. Because this has just happened, it wasn’t immediately clear which other clients might be joining her. According to a client list on IMDB.com, she is aligned with some real up-and-comers and some vets. That list includes The Social Network’s Armie Hammer, Percy Jackson and the Olympians’ Logan Lerman, True Blood (and reported Superman candidate) Joe Manganiello, NBC Chuck's Zachary Levi who just played the male lead in Tangled, and Prom’s Thomas McDonell. She worked on the WME team that reps Spider-Man’s Emma Stone, and vet clients include Kate Bosworth, Bradley Whitford, and Dennis Farina. Franco jumps in the midst of a career-changing year. He’s considered a strong candidate for a Best Actor nomination for playing Aron Ralston in the Danny Boyle-directed 127 Hours. Late last year, Deadline broke the story that he’ll co-host the upcoming Academy Awards with Anne Hathaway.
