Monday, October 25, 2010


Friday posted a story highlighting the outperformance of the market when the US Federal Reserve permanent Open Market operations (POMO).? POMO nothing new for the Fed is therefore a set of data a month is really nothing more than the exploration.? If we consider the data for the past five years, we get a much more realistic (and potentially troubling) perspective of market performance when the US Federal Reserve makes its POMOs agenda.

? Since October 2005 205 operations.? The day that the transaction was conducted complete negative market 41% of the time, positive 53% of the time and finish flat 6% of the time.? The total return on those days was to + 27.28%.This is equivalent to + 48.6% annualized gain.Un look under the hood offers a more useful perspective on the data, however.?

? The days that were positive, 63% of total earnings was held 3 days in March 2009.If we delete these three-day total of earnings equals + 9.98 %.Cela equals one + 18% annualized gain.? If we delete best and worst three days in the game total return waves to 18.1% or a 33.1% annualized gain.?

? Perhaps the most interesting perspective in all of this is looking at long-term markets performance when the US Federal Reserve performs these operations.? As you can see below the market has made shocking when the Fed conducts POMO.? The Fed stopped POMO in May 2007 after a fairly stable calendar.? Market decreased by 20% after a year and a half.? They do not start the new program in September 2008 when the economy was merged.Technically, the program began on September 19, 2008 only days before Lehman.Cela crash heavily skews the crisis of credit operations series starting point.?? If we take that exact departure, the market fell to 2% between that date and the last operation on the 24 March 2010.Of course, one could easily argue that September 2008 operations have been largely unnecessary that the market was already blending mode.?

? Between March 24 and 17 August 2010 when the program was interrupted, the market has declined single channel %.Since then restart the program in August the market increased by 8.3 %.La this following figure a Visual operations and their (potential) market impact:?

? For the period from 2005 to 2007 POMO, there are 50 operations and market advanced a grand total of take % these days.? Given that the market collapse, however, there were 155 operations and the market has advanced a total of + 26.95% on these days.? Thus, outsized returns may be simply a function of coinciding with one of the biggest bull market in history.?

What is so interesting about all of this is the impact of the real world, however. These operations change financial assets net result privés.Par, it is really just good mix. The Fed is printing new funds when it performs these operations. They are simply the trading of goods. They add income from the private sector, they create jobs, they do not succeed better economy (apart from a very debatable and marginal interest rate effect).However, there is a clear argument that there is a strong correlation between the response of the market and the POMO.Si although there is no reason to believe that these operations are in reality we all better off this evidence supports the idea that these operations are correlated with periods of goods "high that they would otherwise be"-in other words, the assets tend to be disconnected from their fundamental principles of these operations in the US Federal Reserve.

I'll be honest with the reader. When I ran this data that I was really hoping that I would find evidence showing that the POMO have no impact on the direction of the market. The conclusion is troubling for obvious reasons.And while it may be nothing more than a case of exploring the evidence is compelling that the Federal Reserve helps increase equity prices without creating positive change also in growth sustainable economic.I'm not a conspiracy, but when I theorist Manager system Open Market account for the Federal Committee, saying that he wished to retain "price higher than that they would otherwise be" combined with this evidence it makes it very difficult to believe that the Fed is not attempting to exceed Bernie Madoff.


The contents of this site is provided as general information only and should not be construed as investment advice.All content on the site should not be interpreted as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or participate in any particular strategy of trade or investment.The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the companies affiliated to the author (s).The opinions of the authors of the guest or contributors and will differ from those of Mr. Roche.Ces views do not necessarily represent views or Mr. Roche.Les authors investment decisions can or may not have a position in any security referenced herein are or may not ask to do business with one another or companies referred to by this site Web.Toute action you take information and analysis on this site is your responsabilité.Consultez ultimately your advisor placement before taking an investment decision.

A short note on the comments-the increase in users of recent months has led to increased improductifs.Tout user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the comment section as a place to insult other users is prohibited on the comments section site.La feedback is welcome to all readers interested in relevant questions and engage in a thoughtful, intelligent discussion and brief productive.En, just be agréable.Merci.

Post footer automatically generated by The Plugin add footer post for wordpress.

This entry transmitted via the service for full-text RSS - if this is your content and you read on someone to another site, please read our FAQ page
Article five filters features: After Hiroshima - non-rapport Cancer Catastrophe of Fallujah.

View the original article here

No comments:

Post a Comment