Friday, October 29, 2010


Error deserializing body of reply message for operation 'Translate'. The maximum string content length quota (8192) has been exceeded while reading XML data. This quota may be increased by changing the MaxStringContentLength property on the XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas object used when creating the XML reader. Line 1, position 9030.

By ComStock Partners?

? Economic growth remains extremely subdued and has double dip is still a strong possibility. ??In the first 4 quarters of the current recovery ended June 30 th, GDP increased at a rate of 3% annualized, compared to an average of 5.9% in previous post-war expansions.Furthermore the rate of growth in the 4th quarter of the recovery (the 2 nd calendar quarter) tapered off to a mere 1.7%, compared to 5.9% in the fourth quarter of prior upturns.? This is even weaker than apparent at first glance since a full 60% of the growth was accounted for by a turnaround in inventories with only 40% coming from final sales.?

The problem now is that the inventory thrust is on the verge of petering out with no other drivers working to sustain the economy.? After the garden variety common recessions in the post-war period, economic recoveries were sparked and sustained by inventories, housing, employment, consumer spending and widely available credit. This time around only the inventory turnaround has worked while the four other factors are too weak to make substantial contributions.

? By summertime the Fed realized that the green shoots that it previously expected to flower into a normal expansion was failing to take root and that more help was needed.? With the political climate making any further tax stimulus highly unlikely, in August Fed Chairman Bernanke began floating the idea of a second big round of quantitative easing (QE2), an initiative that is widely expected to be announced following the next FOMC meeting on November 3 rd.The anticipation of the announcement has sparked rise in stock prices, a decline in bond yields, a drop in the dollar, a jump in commodity prices and a belief by investors that has double dip in the economy would be avoided.?

? In our view QE2 is unlikely to be of much help, and, in addition could have unintended negative consequences. ??Between the Administration, Congress and the Fed, we have already witnessed massive stimulus in the form of TARP, budget stimulus $1.7 trillion of Fed purchases of Treasuries and mortgages, the auto industry bailout cash for clunkers, the homebuyer tax credits, extended unemployment benefits and near-zero interest rates.All of that has so far resulted in an exceedingly weak economic recovery that is showing signs of unraveling as growth remains below stall speed.?

? The supposed purpose of QE2 is to lower long-term interest rates even further and increase the amount of bank reserves in the hope that some of it will find its way into the economy and spur sustainable growth.? The problem is that long-term rates have already come down from a high of about 4% in April to a historical recent low of 2.4%.? It is thereby unlikely that another decline of perhaps another 50 basis points will really make much of a difference.? As for increasing bank reserves, we note that excess reserves are already close to $1 trillion and corporations are sitting on batteries of cash.

? The problem is that what's holding down the economy is not related to high interest rates or lack of liquidity and monetary policy is therefore not the solution.? As we pointed out many times the major problem is an excess of debt and the necessity to deleverage.? Consumers are in the process of attempting to increase savings and barrier down debt. ??Banks are protecting their balance sheets by preparing for further problems with residential and commercial real estate loans and potential additional writedowns. ?Corporations are hoarding cash because they can't find enough attractive opportunities and are reluctant to place an overreliance on outside financing after their experience in the credit crisis.All of this is typical economic behavior following a credit crisis.?

??The Fed knows that that it is about to undertake a great experiment with unforeseeable results and potentially unknown consequences.? Just the expectation of QE2 has weakened the dollar and helped force up commodity prices including food, energy and cotton.? This could result in possibly higher prices for consumers without any significant increases in jobs, a result that would be opposite to its intended effects.On the other hand corporations will probably find it very difficult to pass their commodity price increases along, resulting in a squeeze on profit margins.Already, in recent days a number of companies have reported disappointing results for that very reason. For these reasons the Fed in recent days has attempted to dampen expectations of a "shock and awe" strategy by leaking to the media its intention of instituting QE2 in small increments rather than all at once.

In our view additional stimulus in the form of QE2 will not be able to offset the effects of turmoil. Monetary policy does not work well when banks are reluctant to lend, corporations do not have enough opportunities to invest and consumers are unwilling or unable to borrow. As somebody recently said, we don't remember who), if you lead a horse to water and he won 't drink, then it doesn't' t help to add more water. We believe economic growth will remain under the long-term average return to recession with a strong possibility. This outcome is not reflected in current stock prices.


The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial product, or to participate in any particular trading or investment strategy.The ideas expressed on this site are solely the opinions of the author (s) and do not necessarily represent the views of firms affiliated with the author (s).The opinions of all guest authors or contributors can and will differ from those of Mr. Roche.These opinions do not necessarily represent the views or investment decisions of Mr. Roche.The author (s) may or may not have a position in any security referenced herein and may or may not seek to do business with one another or companies mentioned via this website.Any action you take that as a result of information or analysis on this site is ultimately your responsibility.Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.

A brief note on comments - The increase in users in recent months has resulted in an increase in unproductive comments.Any user who engages in the use of racial epithets or uses the how section as a place to insult other users will be banned from the site.The how section is welcome to all readers who are interested in asking relevant questions and/or engaging in thoughtful, intelligent, and productive debate.In short, just be nice.Thanks.

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read our FAQ page at
Five Filters featured article: Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting of Fallujah's Cancer Catastrophe.

View the original article here

No comments:

Post a Comment